November 20, 2006
USA Today
Columnists' Opinions: When religion loses its credibility
by Oliver "Buzz" Thomas
Galileo was persecuted for revealing what we now know to be the truth
regarding Earth's place in our solar system. Today, the issue is
homosexuality, and the persecution is not of one man but of millions. Will
Christian leaders once again be on the wrong side of history?
What if Christian leaders are wrong about homosexuality? I suppose, much as
a newspaper maintains its credibility by setting the record straight, church
leaders would need to do the same:
Correction: Despite what you might have read, heard or been taught
throughout your churchgoing life, homosexuality is, in fact, determined at
birth and is not to be condemned by God's followers.
Based on a few recent headlines, we won't be seeing that admission anytime
soon.
Last week, U.S. Roman Catholic bishops took the position that homosexual
attractions are "disordered" and that gays should live closeted lives of
chastity. At the same time, North Carolina's Baptist State Convention was
preparing to investigate churches that are too gay-friendly. Even the more
liberal Presbyterian Church (USA) had been planning to put a minister on
trial for conducting a marriage ceremony for two women before the charges
were dismissed on a technicality. All this brings me back to the question:
What if we're wrong?
Religion's only real commodity, after all, is its moral authority. Lose
that, and we lose our credibility. Lose credibility, and we might as well
close up shop.
It's happened to Christianity before, most famously when we dug in our heels
over Galileo's challenge to the biblical view that the Earth, rather than
the sun, was at the center of our solar system. You know the story. Galileo
was persecuted for what turned out to be incontrovertibly true. For many,
especially in the scientific community, Christianity never recovered.
This time, Christianity is in danger of squandering its moral authority by
continuing its pattern of discrimination against gays and lesbians in the
face of mounting scientific evidence that sexual orientation has little or
nothing to do with choice. To the contrary, whether sexual orientation
arises as a result of the mother's hormones or the child's brain structure
or DNA, it is almost certainly an accident of birth. The point is this:
Without choice, there can be no moral culpability.
Answer in Scriptures
So, why are so many church leaders (not to mention Orthodox Jewish and
Muslim leaders) persisting in their view that homosexuality is wrong despite
a growing stream of scientific evidence that is likely to become a torrent
in the coming years? The answer is found in Leviticus 18. "You shall not lie
with a man as with a woman; it is an abomination."
As a former "the Bible says it, I believe it, that settles it" kind of guy,
I am sympathetic with any Christian who accepts the Bible at face value. But
here's the catch. Leviticus is filled with laws imposing the death penalty
for everything from eating catfish to sassing your parents. If you accept
one as the absolute, unequivocal word of God, you must accept them all.
For many of gay America's loudest critics, the results are unthinkable.
First, no more football. At least not without gloves. Handling a pig skin is
an abomination. Second, no more Saturday games even if you can get a new
ball. Violating the Sabbath is a capital offense according to Leviticus. For
the over-40 crowd, approaching the altar of God with a defect in your sight
is taboo, but you'll have plenty of company because those menstruating or
with disabilities are also barred.
The truth is that mainstream religion has moved beyond animal sacrifice,
slavery and the host of primitive rituals described in Leviticus centuries
ago. Selectively hanging onto these ancient proscriptions for gays and
lesbians exclusively is unfair according to anybody's standard of ethics. We
lawyers call it "selective enforcement," and in civil affairs it's illegal.
A better reading of Scripture starts with the book of Genesis and the grand
pronouncement about the world God created and all those who dwelled in it.
"And, the Lord saw that it was good." If God created us and if everything he
created is good, how can a gay person be guilty of being anything more than
what God created him or her to be?
Turning to the New Testament, the writings of the Apostle Paul at first lend
credence to the notion that homosexuality is a sin, until you consider that
Paul most likely is referring to the Roman practice of pederasty, a form of
pedophilia common in the ancient world. Successful older men often took boys
into their homes as concubines, lovers or sexual slaves. Today, such sexual
exploitation of minors is no longer tolerated. The point is that the sort of
long-term, committed, same-sex relationships that are being debated today
are not addressed in the New Testament. It distorts the biblical witness to
apply verses written in one historical context (i.e. sexual exploitation of
children) to contemporary situations between two monogamous partners of the
same sex. Sexual promiscuity is condemned by the Bible whether it's between
gays or straights. Sexual fidelity is not.
What would Jesus do?
For those who have lingering doubts, dust off your Bibles and take a few
hours to reacquaint yourself with the teachings of Jesus. You won't find a
single reference to homosexuality. There are teachings on money, lust,
revenge, divorce, fasting and a thousand other subjects, but there is
nothing on homosexuality. Strange, don't you think, if being gay were such a
moral threat?
On the other hand, Jesus spent a lot of time talking about how we should
treat others. First, he made clear it is not our role to judge. It is God's.
("Judge not lest you be judged." Matthew 7:1) And, second, he commanded us
to love other people as we love ourselves.
So, I ask you. Would you want to be discriminated against? Would you want to
lose your job, housing or benefits because of something over which you had
no control? Better yet, would you like it if society told you that you
couldn't visit your lifelong partner in the hospital or file a claim on his
behalf if he were murdered?
The suffering that gay and lesbian people have endured at the hands of
religion is incalculable, but they can look expectantly to the future for
vindication. Scientific facts, after all, are a stubborn thing. Even our
religious beliefs must finally yield to them as the church in its battle
with Galileo ultimately realized. But for religion, the future might be
ominous. Watching the growing conflict between medical science and religion
over homosexuality is like watching a train wreck from a distance. You can
see it coming for miles and sense the inevitable conclusion, but you're
powerless to stop it. The more church leaders dig in their heels, the worse
it's likely to be.
Oliver "Buzz" Thomas is a Baptist minister and author of an upcoming book,
10 Things Your Minister Wants to Tell You (But Can't Because He Needs the
Job).
|