|
Washington Post
January 28, 2006
(www.washingtonpost.com)
Gay Unions Fracture Md.'s Black Caucus
Civil Rights Pull as Strong as Church's
By Matthew Mosk, Washington Post Staff Writer
Maryland's African American lawmakers are deeply divided in the
emerging debate over same-sex marriage, which forces them to balance
their communities' bedrock religious convictions against a traditional
commitment to civil rights.
In the short time since a Baltimore circuit court declared the state's
ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional, black Democrats in the
General Assembly have reached consensus only on one thing: They don't
want the matter put to a vote.
"We've been discussing it ever since the court issued its opinion,"
said Del. Joanne C. Benson (D-Prince George's). "There is a split. And
no easy way to resolve it."
Consider Sens. Ulysses Currie and Gwendolyn T. Britt. Both are
Democrats who represent progressive African American districts in
Prince George's County. But they are on opposite extremes of a gulf
that divides their communities.
Currie said he will be guided from the pulpit and by Christian
constituents who on this issue alone, he says, "are as conservative as
the conservatives."
Britt said she answers to the echoes of the civil rights era and
supports gay men and lesbians because she knows "how to walk a mile in
someone else's shoes."
The Legislative Black Caucus, perhaps the most reliable voting bloc in
Annapolis on progressive issues, is now being lobbied heavily by
Republicans to vote for a constitutional amendment against same-sex
marriage, which would appear on the ballot in November. Democratic
Party leaders, who believe that such a ballot measure would hurt their
candidates for governor and U.S. Senate, are also pressuring many of
the legislature's 42 black members.
"I'm just hoping and praying the courts will step in," said Currie,
who attends an African Methodist Episcopal church.
The divide over gay marriage is not unique to Maryland. During recent
elections in Georgia, Oklahoma and Ohio, black voters broke from the
Democratic Party in significant numbers to support ballot initiatives
against same-sex marriage, said Ronald Walters, a University of
Maryland political science professor.
In Virginia, where the legislature just approved a constitutional
amendment that would define marriage as a union between a man and a
woman, seven black lawmakers voted for it, seven against.
Republicans in Maryland have submitted constitutional amendment
proposals in both chambers. But for either measure to reach the floor,
the party will likely need to execute a rare procedural maneuver in
which the measures can bypass a committee vote. Republicans lack the
numbers to do that alone, so African American members have become key
targets.
The Legislative Black Caucus has taken the stance that a vote should
wait until the state's high court issues a ruling, Benson said. When
Baltimore Circuit Judge M. Brooke Murdock issued her decision on the
state's 33-year-old ban last Friday, she stayed the ruling until
appellate judges could weigh in.
Not everyone in the caucus wants to wait. Del. Emmett C. Burns Jr.
(D-Baltimore County), for instance, said he plans to sign the GOP
petition. "It's a matter of conscience," said Burns, who ministers to
a Baptist congregation.
Regardless of whether a vote occurs this session, many believe that
the marriage debate could alter the landscape of the 2006 elections.
Supporters of Maryland Lt. Gov. Michael S. Steele (R), who is running
for the U.S. Senate, say he stands to benefit. He has been
aggressively courting church-going black Democrats to cross party
lines.
"Obviously, having that issue surface is a tremendous help to us,"
said Leonardo Alcivar, Steele's campaign spokesman. "It's clearly a
pivotal issue to members of the clergy and important to millions of
Marylanders."
There is some evidence to suggest that the issue could help him
attract Democratic voters, said David Bositis, a senior policy analyst
who studies black voting trends for the Joint Center for Political and
Economic Studies.
A 2004 survey he conducted found that 70 percent of blacks oppose
same-sex marriage, although some backed civil unions, a greater
percentage than did the general population. Bositis also said exit
polls from Ohio and Georgia showed about 60 percent of blacks
supporting constitutional amendments banning same-sex marriage.
"Obviously, it's a position that African Americans support," Bositis
said. "So in that sense, it would have some resonance. But to what
degree it's still not clear."
The Human Rights Campaign, a Washington-based advocacy group, disputes
the notion that the issue hurts African American politicians. It
looked at how black state legislators across the country fared in
reelection efforts after voting against marriage bans. It said that
101 of 104 won reelection, and of the three who didn't, none of the
losses were attributable to their vote against a marriage ban.
But Philip Pannell, a gay rights activist in the District, said black
suburban voters in Maryland have been heavily influenced by churches
on this issue.
"That stuff will basically be supported by the black pastors, and I
think most African Americans will vote for the same-sex marriage ban,
I really do," Pannell said. "It's a shame."
Tomorrow, Bishop Harry R. Jackson Jr. is planning a sermon on the
subject at Hope Christian Church in Bowie, said the Rev. Derek McCoy,
associate pastor. "We have to stand up as a voice and defend what we
believe is sacred right between a man and a woman," McCoy said.
Jackson will also be urging church members to attend a rally Tuesday
in Annapolis to press lawmakers to support the push for a
constitutional amendment.
Other pastors, even some who are active on civil rights issues, said
they would take no position in this political debate.
"For me, personally, it is a moral issue and not a civil rights
issue," said the Rev. Jonathan Weaver, pastor of Greater Mount Nebo
African Methodist Episcopal Church in Upper Marlboro. "In my 18 years
of ministry, I have never had two men or two women come to me asking
to be married. And secondly, there are too many other issues far more
important to my congregation that need to be addressed."
Del. Carolyn J.B. Howard (D-Prince George's) said the church community
is hard to ignore on this issue, especially when she agrees with them.
Given the power invested in the Democratic leadership in Annapolis,
she thinks it is highly unlikely that the measure will reach the floor
of the House or Senate.
But if it does, she said, she has no doubts about what she will do.
"You don't compromise your principles when it comes to these issues.
If it comes to the floor, no one will back away just because of what
party leaders want," she said.
Staff writers Hamil R. Harris and Chris L. Jenkins contributed to
this report.
|